, page under construction

Send email to ltalley@ucsd.edu and bennett@oce.orst.edu.

Back to the AIMS Implementation Plan Contents

Chapter I. Introduction


Draft: March 4, 1997


Chapter I. Table of contents

I. Introduction
I.1. Rationale for the AIMS phase
I.2. Summary of major recommendations

I.2.1. Ocean Model/Data Intercomparison Project (1998-2000)
I.2.2. Modelling and assimilation community efforts
I.2.3. Data Assembly Centers and Special Analysis Centers
I.2.4. Workshops
I.2.4.a. Regional workshops
I.2.4.b Global workshop (2000 or 2001)
I.2.4.c. Ocean modelling workshop (1997 or 1998)
I.2.4.d. Data assimilation workshop (1999 or 2000)
I.2.5. Publications


I. Introduction and summary of major recommendations

I.1. Introduction

WOCE's principle goal, as set forth in the WOCE Scientific Plan (WCRP 6, 1986) is to improve ocean modelling for the ultimate purpose of climate prediction. This goal is supported by a number of objectives which involve description of specific aspects of the ocean circulation and dynamical understanding of ocean processes; such understanding and description are required for progress in validation and improvement of models. The WOCE Implementation Plan (WCRP Reports 11, 12, 1988) described how the scientific objectives are to be achieved, with careful attention to the field work necessary for the global description, and a framework for the process experiments which have been carried out.

The WOCE field observation phase is drawing to a close, ocean modelling has moved to a much higher level of simulation than was possible at the beginning of WOCE, and data assimilation methods are being developed by many groups. WOCE has been extended to the year 2002 to take advantage of the full data set and advances in modelling, for much fuller development of the models and particularly methods for data assimilation. This final term of WOCE is called the AIMS (Analysis, Interpretation, Modelling and Synthesis) phase. The plan laid out herein describes the goals and recommended structures for AIMS.

A major scientific thrust for the remaining years of WOCE is to assess which ocean processes are really important for climate prediction. To have any predictive value, models must accurately describe the present ocean state. In particular, which processes below the surface layer must be observed and modeled in order to increase skill? Is there a minimum resolution in space/time for observations and models which increases predictive skill?

By the end of WOCE we must have estimated heat and freshwater transports and divergences with reasonable error levels. We should be able to say something useful about the time scale and magnitude of variation. We should attempt to characterize (if not parameterize) the deficiencies in model dynamics at various resolutions. We should quantify the principle mechanisms for transporting heat, freshwater and mass - these results should be central to arguments about what mechanisms should be present in a viable ocean model. That is, what are the relative roles of the Ekman layer, subduction, convection, mixing, and the deep overturning circulation? We should improve estimates of diapycnal fluxes and upwelling. Improving such estimates will require process studies designed to reveal the roles of smaller scale phenomena in the general circulation.

In addition to improvements for climate prediction, the WOCE data set and modelling will result in improved regional descriptions of circulation, in all ocean basins as well as in the specific Core 2 (Southern Ocean) and Core 3 (North Atlantic and Brazil Basin) regions.

Synthesis of WOCE data and improved modelling calls for equally prioritized progress in three overlapping areas: data analysis, prognostic modelling and data assimilation. The WOCE goals are written in terms of improvement of ocean modelling for climate prediction. Since much of our understanding of processes in the ocean comes from observations, models cannot be improved without thorough consideration of data. Adequate resources for ocean model development are needed to carry the current piecemeal progress forward. Ocean data assimilation, even for the goal of estimating the state of the ocean in a dynamically-consistent manner as opposed to its use in climate prediction, is still in the developmental stage. The data assimilation techniques being used in oceanographic data assimilation are similar in complexity to state of the art assimilation methods used in numerical weather prediction, although the different nature of the two problems requires also different assimilation approaches. Also, advanced assimilation techniques are rapidly entering the arena of ENSO prediction. Nevertheless, ocean models, even high resolution ones that are initialized by data assimilation, still leave room for improvements, which is where the WOCE AIMS phase is expected to make a significant contribution.

The AIMS plan is organized as follows.

* Chapter 2: the WOCE scientific goals are described with brief accounts of current progress towards achieving them and a description of how WOCE can facilitate continued progress, through combination of the three approaches: data analysis, modelling and data assimilation. These methods should not be viewed as separate, but should be used in whatever combination is most fruitful for achieving the WOCE goals.

* Chapter 3: WOCE data analysis is resulting in descriptions of phenomena and hypotheses regarding ocean dynamics. Analysis based principally on the data sets themselves must continue, with increasing steps towards combined use of data and models. Complete combination of data with models is considered under data assimilation. The goals of the data analysis are described. Priorities could be assigned if necessary, but methods should not be prescribed. The WOCE data types are reviewed, including the organizational structures which are necessary for assembling, archiving, and distributing the data, in light of the expected WOCE users for each type of data. Although WOCE field observations technically will cease at the end of 1997, some of the data streams will continue as part of other climate programs, and so some portions of the organizational structures which assist in acquiring the data should be continued, although perhaps with funding separate from WOCE.

* Chapter 4: The current state of ocean modelling relevant for WOCE is reviewed and a strategy for the next 5 years is proposed. WOCE modelling is focused on the ocean, but central to its purpose is evaluation of ocean models of varying formulation and resolution for use in couple climate models. The section includes recommendations for model developments and validation and an assessment of the resources (manpower, computing, centers, workshops, publications) which are needed or would be useful.

* Chapter 5: WOCE data assimilation is described, including an assessment of the present state, goals and resource assessments for the next five years. It is emphasized that the combination of models and data for WOCE is state estimation rather than predictive assimilation. While it was expected in the original WOCE science plan that data assimilation would eventually be central to WOCE, developments at that time were minimal, and so a full discussion of assimilation issues was not possible. Major developments have taken place in ocean data assimilation in the past few years, and it is expected that development will accelerate. Three areas of development for WOCE are prescribed, ranked in order of immediate to long-term achievability: inverse methods with simplified dynamics, crude assimilation into high resolution models, statistically-accurate assimilation into coarse resolution models. and accurate assimilation into high resolution models. The ultimate goal of accurate assimilation into high resolution models will only be achieved with these developments and a large increase in computer power.

I.2. Summary of specific recommendations

The general plan for development in each of the three overlapping areas - data analysis, modelling and data assimilation - is described in the chapters below. Each includes many detailed requirements and recommendations. Specific activities which either require large pooled resources (such as centers) or advance community planning (such as intercomparison projects or workshops) are highlighted in this section.

I.2.1. Ocean Model/Data Intercomparison Project

The WCRP has suggested that WOCE and CLIVAR consider an ocean modelling intercomparison project. WOCE supports this in principle provided its objectives contribute to the achievement of WOCE goals but recommends that it should include substantial comparison of models with data as well as with each other. Thus it would be an Ocean Model Data Intercomparison Project (OMDIP). Suggested objectives and a timetable for the OMDIP are described in IV.4.2 below. It would be focused on the ability of ocean models to represent the three-dimensional structure and circulation of the ocean, its variability, and representation of seasonal and long-term climate change.

Discussion of and planning for a joint WOCE/CLIVAR OMDIP will be carried out at an ocean modelling workshop in late 1997 or early 1998.

I.2.2. Modelling and assimilation community efforts

Development of next generation ocean models is a central function for WOCE. Development usually takes the form of improving an algorithm in a specific functioning model. The models are primarily situated in national centers because of the large computational and manpower resources required for running high resolution ocean models for enough time to gather information on parameter sensitivity and model statistics. The developments however are often carried out by modellers who are in universities or smaller laboratories. Thus coordination is needed, as described in IV.4.3 below. The AIMS IP proposes a joint project involving several modellers in universities whose research (e.g. on novel numeric codes, new sub-grid scale process parameterisations, improved atmospheric interfaces) are incorporated into a central model run by a national centre. Such a structure is already in place for the UK OCCAM project.

Assimilation of the many WOCE data sets, which include not only the one-time hydrographic data but also many data streams with continuing temporal sampling, into high-resolution models will require substantial resources and organization, as well as major development. While development can be distributed among individuals and groups, the need for supercomputer time and assimilation of the ongoing data streams indicates the usefulness of dedicated centers. These centers or large projects could also provide the funding stability required for the development of methods. A description of the functions of such centers is found in V.4.4 below.

I.2.3. Data Assembly Centers and Special Analysis Centers

The smooth and continuous functioning of the data system is necessary through the end of WOCE. Although the observational phase of WOCE ends in 1997, many data sets will still be processed after that time. Some data sets will still be producing data (for instance drifters and floats for which five years of data must be collected), and some data streams will be ongoing and in the process of transition to other climate programs. Assembly, quality control, documentation and distribution of all of these data sets will be required, necessitating full support for the Data Assembly Centers and archives.

As WOCE data assimilation and model/data intercomparison projects mature, new demands for data products and documentation are likely to be placed on the Data Assembly Centers and Special Analysis Centers. In chapter III are included some suggestions for desirable data products. Some will be produced directly by the DACs and SACs while others will produced by PIs working on data from DACs or in conjunction with DACs and SACs.

I.2.4. Workshops

The WOCE workshops have been planned to bring together investigators who are concentrating on WOCE problems through observations, modelling or data assimilation, to present work already accomplished or in progress, and to stimulate progress towards completion of the WOCE goals. The regional workshops serve as a focal point for completion of and assembly of the data sets for those geographical regions. The modelling and assimilation workshops serve as focal points for planning comparison projects.

I.2.4.a. Regional workshops

Workshops focused on results for each ocean region have been scheduled. The first of these, for the Pacific Ocean, was held in 1996 and the report and recommendations have been published. Special publications for the Pacific Ocean are moving forward. The South Atlantic and Southern Ocean workshops are being held in 1997, the Indian Ocean workshop in 1998 and the North Atlantic workshop in 1999.

I.2.4.b. Global workshop (2000 or 2001)

The WOCE goals are global rather than regional. For practical reasons of data collection, model resolution and analysis, and simply the importance of complete understanding of regional processes, the WOCE workshops were originally structured around ocean basins. However, there are processes, analyses, data sets and models which are best discussed in a global context. An example of such a process is the overturning circulation for the global ocean. Phenomena which are common to all oceans are subduction, the eddy variability of subtropical regions versus equatorial regions, mode water formation, and mixing, among many possible examples. Data sets which are almost always analyzed in a global fashion are altimetry and other satellite products, sea surface temperature, and air-sea flux estimates. The other WOCE data sets should begin to be viewed in a more global fashion than is done in the regional workshops. Most of the large modelling centers are running global models of varying resolution at this point.

Therefore there is a need for a global workshop, focused on analysis and synthesis of the global datasets and models. This should be scheduled after the last of the regional workshops, but before the end of WOCE since its purpose, like that of the regional workshops, is to assess work in progress and encourage progress towards completion of WOCE goals.

I.2.4.c. Ocean modelling workshop (1997 or 1998)

A modelling workshop that will address the modelling issues discussed in this report, as well as future directions in ocean modelling, will be held in 1997 or 1998 (see section IV.4.1 below). The workshop will be co-sponsored by the WOCE SMWG and the CLIVAR NEG-2 committees. The workshop will be used to report the current status of WOCE modelling efforts. It will also discuss future directions for ocean modelling. These might include technical issues such as novel numerical methods that can and should be incorporated into ocean models, the preparation of the next generation ocean models to be used within coupled models, development of state-of-the-art one-minute resolution ocean models, novel ocean-atmosphere-ice coupling schemes, etc.

The workshop will discuss an ocean model/data intercomparison project (OMDIP) (see I.2.1 and IV.4.2). At issue are the usefulness and timing of such a project, and its scope. The workshop will make recommendations on whether and how to carry out an OMDIP.

I.2.4.d. Data assimilation workshop (1999 or 2000)

Data assimilation aimed at WOCE goals is just beginning in earnest. Since methods are still in development, sufficient resources are not yet in place, and data are only now becoming available in sufficient quantity, it will be 1999 or 2000 before a workshop dedicated to WOCE data assimilation will be useful. The workshop might focus on mid-latitude oceans, assimilation of sparse data sets with long time scales, the treatment of eddies and permanent flows of small spatial scales, the direct measurement and indirect inference of errors in the dynamics of ocean models, and various technical methods such as Kalman filtering, nudging, optimal interpolation, and various inverse method approaches.

The data assimilation workshop might also make recommendations for an intercomparison study, as described in section V.5 below.

I.2.5. Publications

The ultimate legacy of WOCE includes the published intellectual contributions of the many scientists involved in WOCE, printed and online data products which have evolved from atlases, and ultimately reviews and monographs. It is suggested that each of the WOCE workshop committees take as a central function the coordination of publications relating to the primary workshop topics. These committees should be coordinated by a central WOCE publications committee.


Lynne Talley, ltalley@ucsd.edu
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
University of California, San Diego, CA

Andrew Bennett bennett@oce.orst.edu
Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon

Last updated March 4, 1997