, page under
construction
Send email to ltalley@ucsd.edu and bennett@oce.orst.edu.
I. Introduction
I.1. Rationale for the AIMS phase
I.2. Summary of major recommendations
WOCE's principle goal, as set forth in the WOCE Scientific Plan (WCRP
6, 1986) is to improve ocean modelling for the
ultimate purpose of climate prediction.
This goal is supported by a number of objectives which
involve description of specific aspects of the ocean circulation and
dynamical understanding of ocean processes; such understanding and
description are required for progress in validation and
improvement of models. The WOCE Implementation Plan (WCRP Reports 11, 12, 1988)
described how the scientific objectives are to be achieved,
with careful attention to the field work necessary for the global description,
and a framework for the process experiments which
have been carried out.
The WOCE field observation phase is drawing to a close, ocean modelling
has moved to a much higher level of simulation than was possible
at the beginning of WOCE, and data assimilation methods are being
developed by many groups. WOCE has been extended to the year 2002 to
take advantage of the full data set and advances in modelling, for
much fuller development of the models and particularly methods
for data assimilation.
This final term of WOCE is called the AIMS (Analysis, Interpretation,
Modelling and Synthesis) phase. The plan laid out herein describes the
goals and recommended structures for AIMS.
A major scientific thrust for the remaining years
of WOCE is to assess which ocean processes are really
important for climate prediction. To have any predictive
value, models must accurately describe the present ocean
state. In particular, which processes below the surface
layer must be observed and modeled in order to increase
skill? Is there a minimum resolution in space/time for
observations and models which increases predictive skill?
By the end of WOCE we must have estimated heat and
freshwater transports and divergences with reasonable error
levels. We should be able to say something useful about the
time scale and magnitude of variation. We should attempt to
characterize (if not parameterize) the deficiencies in
model dynamics at various resolutions. We should quantify
the principle mechanisms for transporting heat, freshwater
and mass - these results should be central to arguments
about what mechanisms should be present in a viable ocean
model. That is, what are the relative roles of the Ekman
layer, subduction, convection, mixing, and the deep
overturning circulation? We should improve estimates of
diapycnal fluxes and upwelling. Improving such estimates will
require process studies designed to reveal the roles of smaller scale
phenomena in the general circulation.
In addition to improvements for climate prediction, the WOCE
data set and modelling will result in improved regional
descriptions of circulation, in all ocean basins as well as
in the specific Core 2 (Southern Ocean) and Core 3 (North
Atlantic and Brazil Basin) regions.
Synthesis of WOCE data and improved modelling calls for
equally prioritized progress in three overlapping areas: data analysis,
prognostic modelling and data assimilation. The WOCE goals
are written in terms of improvement of ocean modelling for
climate prediction. Since much of our understanding of
processes in the ocean comes from observations, models
cannot be improved without thorough consideration of data.
Adequate resources for ocean model development are needed to
carry the current piecemeal progress forward. Ocean data
assimilation, even for the goal of estimating the state of
the ocean in a dynamically-consistent manner as opposed to
its use in climate prediction, is still in the developmental
stage. The data assimilation techniques being used
in oceanographic data assimilation are similar
in complexity to state of the art
assimilation methods used in numerical weather prediction, although
the different nature of the two problems requires also different
assimilation approaches.
Also, advanced assimilation techniques are rapidly
entering the arena of ENSO prediction.
Nevertheless, ocean models, even high resolution ones that are
initialized by data assimilation, still leave room for improvements,
which is where the WOCE AIMS phase is expected to make a significant
contribution.
The AIMS plan is organized as follows.
* Chapter 2: the WOCE scientific
goals are described with brief accounts of current progress towards
achieving them and a description of how WOCE can facilitate
continued progress, through combination of the three approaches:
data analysis, modelling and data assimilation. These methods
should not be viewed as separate, but should be used
in whatever combination is most fruitful for achieving the
WOCE goals.
* Chapter 3: WOCE data analysis is resulting in descriptions of
phenomena and hypotheses regarding ocean dynamics. Analysis
based principally on the data sets themselves must continue,
with increasing steps towards combined use of data and models.
Complete combination of data with models is considered under
data assimilation. The goals of the data analysis are described.
Priorities
could be assigned if necessary, but methods should not be prescribed.
The WOCE data types are reviewed, including the organizational structures
which are necessary for assembling, archiving,
and distributing the data, in light of the expected WOCE
users for each type of data. Although WOCE field observations
technically will cease at the end of 1997, some of the
data streams will continue as part of other
climate programs, and so some portions of the organizational
structures which assist in acquiring the data
should be continued, although perhaps with funding separate
from WOCE.
* Chapter 4: The current state of ocean modelling relevant for WOCE is reviewed
and a strategy for the next 5 years is proposed. WOCE modelling is
focused on the ocean, but central to its purpose is evaluation
of ocean models of varying formulation and resolution for use in
couple climate models. The section includes recommendations for
model developments and validation and an assessment of the
resources (manpower, computing,
centers, workshops, publications) which are needed or would be useful.
* Chapter 5:
WOCE data assimilation is described, including an assessment of
the present state, goals and resource assessments for the next five years.
It is emphasized that the combination of models and data for
WOCE is state estimation rather than predictive assimilation.
While it was
expected in the original WOCE science plan that data
assimilation would eventually be central to WOCE, developments at that
time were minimal, and so a full discussion of assimilation issues was not
possible.
Major developments have taken place in ocean data assimilation in
the past few years, and it is expected that development will accelerate.
Three areas of development for WOCE are prescribed, ranked in order of immediate
to long-term achievability: inverse methods with simplified dynamics,
crude assimilation into high resolution models, statistically-accurate
assimilation into coarse resolution models.
and accurate assimilation into high resolution models. The
ultimate goal of accurate assimilation into high resolution models
will only be achieved with these developments
and a large increase in computer power.
Discussion of and planning for a joint WOCE/CLIVAR OMDIP will be
carried out at an ocean modelling workshop in late 1997 or early 1998.
Assimilation of the many WOCE data sets, which include not only the one-time
hydrographic data but also many data streams with continuing
temporal sampling, into high-resolution models will require
substantial resources and organization, as well as major development.
While development can be distributed among individuals
and groups, the need for supercomputer time and assimilation of the
ongoing data streams indicates the usefulness of dedicated centers.
These centers or large projects could also provide the funding stability
required for the development of methods.
A description of the functions of such centers is found in V.4.4 below.
As WOCE data assimilation and model/data intercomparison projects
mature, new demands for data products and
documentation are likely to be placed on the Data Assembly Centers
and Special Analysis Centers.
In chapter III are included some suggestions for
desirable data products. Some
will be produced directly by the DACs and SACs while others will
produced by PIs working on data from DACs or in conjunction with DACs
and SACs.
Therefore there is a need for a global workshop, focused
on analysis and synthesis of the global datasets and
models. This should be scheduled after the last
of the regional workshops, but before the end of
WOCE since its purpose, like that of the regional
workshops, is to assess work in progress and encourage
progress towards completion of WOCE goals.
A modelling workshop that will address the modelling issues
discussed in this report, as well as future directions in ocean
modelling, will be held in 1997 or 1998 (see section IV.4.1 below).
The workshop will be co-sponsored by the WOCE SMWG and the
CLIVAR NEG-2 committees. The workshop will be
used to report the current status of WOCE
modelling efforts. It will also
discuss future directions for ocean modelling. These might include
technical issues such as novel numerical methods that can
and should be incorporated into ocean models, the
preparation of the next generation ocean models to be used within
coupled models, development of state-of-the-art one-minute resolution
ocean models, novel ocean-atmosphere-ice coupling schemes, etc.
The workshop will discuss an ocean model/data
intercomparison project (OMDIP) (see I.2.1 and IV.4.2).
At issue are the usefulness and
timing of such a project, and its scope.
The workshop will make recommendations on whether and how to carry
out an OMDIP.
The data assimilation workshop
might also make recommendations for an
intercomparison study, as described in section V.5 below.
Lynne Talley,
ltalley@ucsd.edu
Andrew Bennett
bennett@oce.orst.edu
Last updated March 4, 1997
I. Introduction and summary of major recommendations
I.1. Introduction
I.2. Summary of specific recommendations
The general plan for development in each of the three overlapping
areas - data analysis, modelling and data assimilation - is described in
the chapters below. Each includes many detailed requirements and
recommendations.
Specific activities which either require large pooled resources (such
as centers) or advance community planning (such as intercomparison
projects or workshops) are highlighted in this section.
I.2.1. Ocean Model/Data Intercomparison Project
The WCRP has suggested that WOCE and CLIVAR consider an
ocean modelling intercomparison project.
WOCE supports this in principle provided its
objectives contribute to the achievement of WOCE goals but recommends
that it should include substantial comparison of models with data as
well as with each other. Thus it would be an Ocean Model Data
Intercomparison Project (OMDIP).
Suggested objectives and a timetable for
the OMDIP
are described in IV.4.2 below. It would be focused on
the ability of ocean models to represent the three-dimensional
structure and circulation of the ocean, its variability, and
representation of seasonal and long-term climate change.
I.2.2. Modelling and assimilation community efforts
Development of next generation ocean models is a central function
for WOCE. Development usually takes the form of improving an
algorithm in a specific functioning model. The models are primarily
situated in national centers because of the large computational
and manpower resources required for running high resolution ocean models
for enough time to gather information on parameter sensitivity and model
statistics.
The developments however are often carried out by modellers who
are in universities or smaller laboratories.
Thus coordination is needed, as described in IV.4.3 below.
The AIMS IP proposes a
joint project involving several modellers in universities whose
research (e.g. on novel numeric codes, new sub-grid scale process
parameterisations, improved atmospheric interfaces) are incorporated
into a central model run by a national centre. Such a structure is
already in place for the UK OCCAM project.
I.2.3. Data Assembly Centers and Special Analysis Centers
The smooth and continuous functioning of the data system
is necessary through the end of WOCE. Although
the observational phase of WOCE ends in 1997,
many data sets will still be processed after that time.
Some data sets will still be producing data (for
instance drifters and floats for which five years
of data must be collected), and some data streams
will be ongoing and in the process of transition to other
climate programs. Assembly, quality control, documentation
and distribution of all of these data sets will be required,
necessitating full support for the Data Assembly Centers and
archives.
I.2.4. Workshops
The WOCE workshops have been planned to bring together
investigators who are concentrating on WOCE problems
through observations, modelling or data assimilation,
to present work already accomplished or in progress,
and to stimulate progress towards completion of the WOCE goals. The
regional workshops serve as a focal point for completion of and
assembly of the data sets for those geographical regions.
The modelling and assimilation workshops serve as focal points
for planning comparison projects.
I.2.4.a. Regional workshops
Workshops focused on results for each ocean region have
been scheduled. The first of these, for the Pacific Ocean,
was held in 1996 and the report and recommendations
have been published.
Special publications for the Pacific Ocean are moving forward.
The South Atlantic and Southern Ocean
workshops are being held in 1997, the Indian Ocean workshop
in 1998 and the North Atlantic workshop in 1999.
I.2.4.b. Global workshop (2000 or 2001)
The WOCE goals are global rather than regional.
For practical reasons of data collection, model
resolution and analysis, and simply the importance
of complete understanding of regional processes, the
WOCE workshops were originally structured around
ocean basins. However, there are processes,
analyses, data sets and models which are
best discussed in a global context.
An example of such a process is the overturning
circulation for the global ocean.
Phenomena which are common to all oceans are
subduction, the eddy variability of
subtropical regions versus equatorial regions,
mode water formation,
and mixing, among many possible examples.
Data sets which are almost always analyzed in a global
fashion are altimetry and other satellite products,
sea surface temperature,
and air-sea flux estimates. The other WOCE data sets
should begin to be viewed in a more global fashion
than is done in the regional workshops.
Most of the large modelling centers are running
global models of varying resolution at this point.
I.2.4.c. Ocean modelling workshop (1997 or 1998)
I.2.4.d. Data assimilation workshop (1999 or 2000)
Data assimilation aimed at WOCE goals is just beginning
in earnest. Since methods are still in development,
sufficient resources are not yet in place, and data are
only now becoming available in sufficient quantity, it will
be 1999 or 2000 before a workshop dedicated to WOCE data assimilation
will be useful.
The workshop might focus on mid-latitude oceans, assimilation of
sparse data sets with long time scales, the treatment of eddies
and permanent flows of small spatial scales,
the direct measurement and indirect
inference of errors in the dynamics of ocean models,
and various technical
methods such as Kalman filtering, nudging,
optimal interpolation, and various inverse method approaches.
I.2.5. Publications
The ultimate legacy of WOCE includes the published intellectual
contributions of the many scientists involved in WOCE,
printed and online data products which have evolved from atlases, and
ultimately reviews and monographs.
It is suggested that each of the WOCE workshop committees take
as a central function the coordination of publications relating
to the primary workshop topics. These committees should be
coordinated by a central WOCE publications committee.
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
University of California, San Diego, CA
Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon